I’m writing this article in response to clickTRUE’s blog post on article spinning being bad and their advice for people to NOT do it. clickTRUE is an online marketing company and subsidiary of SPH Magazines, that was started by the wonderful guys who founded Hardwarezone. But first, what is article spinning? It’s the use of article spinners to re-write the content of an article, blog post, etc. to create copies that are seen as different from the original. Is it bad? Not, entirely. Can it be used legitimately? Yes. Contrary to what Shi Ming had written, Google doesn’t usually penalize a website for duplicate content. If it did, article directories (e.g. GoArticles) and press release websites (e.g. Prlog.org) would be the first to get penalized. What Google actually does is to omit duplicate content that it feels doesn’t add any value to the original piece - there’s no penalty. Don’t believe? Watch this explanation by Greg Grothaus, Google’s Software Engineer for Search Quality. How to Use Article Spinning Legitimately It’s no secret that some of the ways to obtain backlinks for SEO are from article directories, press release websites and blogs. But what if in addition to mere backlinks, I want exposure for my article, which (hopefully) in turn, result in clicks to my website? A published article on authority sites like EzineArticles almost always get a favourable ranking, especially for low competition, longtail keywords. What if I want to use the same content for submission to the hundreds of article directories out there for maximum SEO benefit …I can’t be writing a totally unique article for each directory, can I? Of course, some article directories do require in the Editorial Guidelines that the submitted articles be unique. This is where article spinning can be used, i.e. to re-write my articles into unique copies so that they will be accepted by the Editors and also indexed by Google. It’s not illegal, it’s just a smarter way of doing things. Writing Unique Articles There are quite advanced article spinners out there that not only lets you “change/move some parts” of articles, but also spin entire sentences or paragraphs. Some even have user-submitted, built-in synonyms that are far more intelligent than the traditional use of thesaurus. All you need to do is copy-and-paste your article as unformatted text and add in the synonyms (the common syntax is usually pipes and curlies) until the uniqueness count is above 75%. Then with a click of a button, the spinner is able to generate hundreds of copies from the original. In summary, using such tools is not always bad depending on how you use them. A smart SEO is able to use them to his/her advantage, of course, given due consideration to search engine rules and guidelines. Finally, a little bit of automation (you’d be suprise with the type of tools available out there) benefits everyone because it lowers the costs of implementation, which savings can be passed on to your clients.
Article spinning is NOT only used on plagiarized content. You can also spin your own articles.
But what is defined as unique? Ideally, it should be able to pass Copyscape, although, a 75%-80% uniqueness should get you through Google’s duplicate filters.




Hi Larry,
It’s great to have you join in the discussion. :)
I’ve already replied to your comment over at my blog post and won’t bore you by repeating it here.
As I’ve mentioned in the clarification, I’m not against article marketing in general, but rather the use of article spinning to ‘cheat’ the search engines, or even plagiarize other people’s content.
While the term article spinning can be quite vague and imply anything from outright content-scraping to hand-crafted well-written copies, this gist of it is this:
If you now work for Google or any of the article directories and you genuinely find the resulting work of added value to the company, then its good. :)
However, if as part of their company, you find the resulting work to be something that you’d work towards filtering off your system, then you can be sure there are engineers working towards that end as well, and it’s probably worth thinking it over.
Thanks again for your thoughts.
-Shi Ming
Comment by Shi Ming on May 24, 2010 at 4:30 pm
For everyone’s benefit, I’ve reproduced my reply to Shi Ming below:
I’m not sure if your response is quite correct because after all, the subject of your blog post IS about article spinning and SEO – not about article marketing in general or the ethical aspects of spinning.
And I think I’ve illustrated quite clearly how to use article spinning legitimately to obtain backlinks for SEO.
It’s a necessary evil that is required to get your article accepted by the editors and get indexed by Google.
Perhaps, you should think at a more macro level, i.e. not put spinned content only on your own site but instead, on external sites – this way there’s absolutely no risk in getting your own website penalized. Some SEOs use article spinning this way to build linkwheels.
I’m not going to list my spinned articles but if you, Gino or Jackie want to have a look, feel free to email me for an example list.
I assure you they are highly-readable and not gibberish :)
Comment by Larry Lim on May 24, 2010 at 6:23 pm